Βρώμικο γεωπολιτικό παιχνίδι η επίθεση με χημικά στη Συρία

Dirty Geopolitical Game: West-Backed Jihadis Carried Out Syria Chemical Attack

 False Flag Chemical Attack in Syria?

Today’s chemical incident is another reason why the Syrian war must come to an end and let the people regain their lives. Isn’t six years of war enough? Aren’t you satisfied yet? Animals don’t kill each other for revenge but we are being killed for more than 2,200 days to satisfy the barbaric instincts of some extremists now. Today only minutes after the chemical attack, even before investigations could be conducted and for evidence to emerge, Federica Mogherini, the high representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs, condemned the Syrian Government.

Well, let me tell you why the Syrian government isn’t responsible for using chemical weapons in Khan Sheikhoun (Idlib province). First of all, the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons has supervised the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons in 2014 and since then various terrorist groups operating in Syria have used chemical weapons including poisonous sarin gas but the international community didn’t utter a word.

Some would ask: do these Islamic militants have chemical weapons? Of course they have.  If the Media and Western governments refuse to acknowledge this truth, that doesn’t mean that the terrorists don’t have chemicals. 

Now, in 2013 leading investigative journalist Seymour M. Hersh conducted his research and in fact he embarrassed the Obama administration.

CNN: And so, what exactly are you reporting?

Seymour Hersh: “The basic real point that I make is that we know,  and we ’ve known since Spring, that the most radical Jihadi,  if you will, of opposition group, rebel group Al Nusra, we’re talking about serious Salafis Wahabis, if you will, had access to sarin. There was a lot of intelligence reporting about it. The White House can say anything they want about it, but that is a fact, that they had access to sarin.

So, when the incident took place, the one thing they didn’t do is they didn’t consider the possibility that Al Nusra could have been one of the people involved. They went right away to the notion that it had to be Bashar and the world’s press went with them including the American press.

And in fact they didn’t have much of a case. There is sarin, it was used. The sarin, that the Syrian Army has, has a different chemical component than the sarin that would be made by Al-Nusra, because the army is more sophisticated, it has certain additives. Certainly somebody has looked at that. I don’t know why they don’t talk about this sarin they have, and whether it shows that it came from the Army or did not.

The other thing one could say is what the president said, suggested, that “we were watching in real- time”.  What we heard him say in that bit, “we were watching in real- time” as this incident took place. That’s not so. The government has acknowledged now, they acknowledged they were not watching in real time. It was after the fact. Then, the question then is, if it’s such a wonderful case he has and they are so sure, why so quick to walk away? Why say, after a little heat, why say that we’re going to go, all of a sudden - he’s  a constitutionalist, the guy who invaded Tripoli without one worry about the War Powers Act- all of a sudden he wants to go to Congress.”

 CNN (…) (…) (…)

Seymour Hersh:  “Has there been any positive evidence yet? Has anybody said here’s the chemical? Did we know that the Front, no matter what they say, the Syrian opposition, and not necessarily the free Syrian Army, the secular opposition, the Islamist opposition, has access to this stuff?

It’s not hard to make sarin. You could mix in the backyard, two chemicals melded together. The fact is, they have it, we know it, they are not talking about it. It’s embarrassing to them. I don’t mean to embarrass them. But that’s, you know, I’m sorry, that’s just the way it is. It was there, they should have been a suspect and they weren’t looked at.”

(You may watch the entire interview here)

Now listen to that. The leading United Nations investigator Carla del Ponte on the same issue:

“During our investigation for crimes against humanity and war crimes we collect some witness testimony that made to appear that some chemical weapons were used, in particular nervin gas, and what appeared to our investigation was that this was used by the opponents, by the rebels, and we have no, no indication at all that the government of Syria,  the authority of the Syrian government has used chemical weapons (…)”.

So these terrorists do have chemical weapons. Now, one-o-one of any political analysis is to search for the beneficiary after the occurrence of any incident. Back in 2012 the Turkey-Saudi backed militants used chemical weapons on the Syrian Army in Aleppo. The Syrian government received UN investigators for a fact-checking mission in August 2013 and on the same eve of their arrival a chemical attack happened in east Ghouta and the Western governments and their liberal and Islamist warmongering journalists accused the Assad government. 

Now ask yourself this question: if the Syrian government calling for UN investigators to Syria to verify a chemical attack, would it drop gas on eastern Ghouta while the UN is in Syria? What kind of retarded should someone be to believe this lie? Now today’s chemical attack is not different from the 2013 attack. 

Number one it comes only a few days after the Syrian army clashed al Qaeda in North Hama moving forward towards Surah, Mork and then Khan Sheikhoun and number two it comes after few days of the US foreign minister saying Washington’s priority is no more removing Assad from power but to defeat Isis.

So here comes Assad asking himself this question “Hmm, things are pretty good; I’m winning in Hama, I have won in Aleppo, soon I will finish on Al Qaeda in the suburbs of Damascus, Trump is saying he no more wants to remove me from power, so let me use these chemical weapons, which I don’t have, to cause anger and foil the Russian-American efforts to defeat Isis”. Use it (your brain).

Now, before ending this episode, I have three observations:

Number one,  anti-Assad oriented TV correspondent has already prepared for media campaign to cover the Russian and Syrian air strikes in Hama countryside against terrorist forces with allegations that the air forces have been using chemical weapons. This tweet came one day before today’s chemical attack.  It seems like someone forgot to tell him that it would not occur for a few more hours before his tweet.

Number two, terrorist Mohammed Alloush, the leader of Islamic army, says a new kind of chemical gas has been used in Khan Sheikhoun. Hmm, wait a second, how does Alloush know this is a new kind of gas from his hotel in Turkey? I believe no one could know unless he had prior knowledge and this explains why he deleted his statement from Twitter.

And number three, which is also important, why do al Qaeda civil depends upon “White Helmets” and are not using gloves while carrying the victims poisoned by sarin gas?

Last time I saw an evacuation of chemical attack victims was in Tokyo, and this is how it looked like:

Anyway, after my preliminary investigation and several calls to renowned journalists in Syria, I can say the Syrian army conducted one air strike over Khan Sheikhoun today, hitting a weapon’s factory. So my guess is the factory might have contained chemicals, used by the terrorists to produce chemical weapons. But this is just a guess, huh. We don’t have any kind of confirmation yet.

So, as I promised you, I’m here to debunk the fake news of the mainstream media. So please share this video around and be part of destroying the fake news. See you next time.

Source

Transcription of video to text and links added by Maria Seferou